Table of Contents
Item 1: Mission, Values and Vision Statement (Principle 1)
Item 2: Library Strategic Plan (Principle 1)
Item 3: Group Study Rooms (Principle 2.5)
Item 4: Contributions to Professional Library Organizations (Principle 2)
Item 5: Total Annual Research Assistance Transactions (Principle 4.6)
Item 6: Research Assistance Transactions by Audience (Principle 4.6)
Item 7: Frequency of READ Scale Values (Principle 4.6)
Item 8: Narrative Responses to Patron Surveys (Principle 4.6)
Item 9: Library Seating (Principle 6.5)
Item 10: Allocation Formula for Academic Book Requests (Principle 5.1)
Item 11: Instructional Sessions per Teaching Librarian (Principle 8.1)
Item 12: Instructional Sessions per Semester (Principle 8.2)
Item 13: LibQUAL Results Link
Item 14: LibQUAL 2012 Results Notebook Summary
Item 15: LibQUAL Comments Summary
Item 1: Mission, Values and Vision Statement (Principle 1)
Mission
The faculty and staff of the Andruss Library at Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania –
Facilitate and advocate for the exploration and creation of knowledge
for personal and professional success.
Values
Vision
Be a leader –
Be part of the larger dialogue about the effectiveness and quality of higher education
Item 2: Library Strategic Plan (Principle 1)
Strategic Plan – using the Bloomsburg University Strategic Plan, Impact 2015, as a framework –
Strategic Issue 1 – Enhancing academic excellence
Strategic Issue 2 – Achieving excellence while ensuring financial sustainability
Strategic Issue 3 – Designing an enrollment vision in terms of demand, program mix and capacity
Strategic Issue 4 – Fostering and developing a strong sense of community
Item 3: Group Study Rooms (Principle 2.5)
Item 3 Group Study Rooms (AY 2014/15) |
|||
Floor |
Group Study Rooms |
Group Study Rooms with Large Monitors |
Group Study Rooms with Whiteboards |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
12 |
7 |
3 |
9 |
7 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
Total |
31 |
29 |
24 |
Item 4: Contributions to Professional Library Organizations
Andruss Library’s contributions to professional Library organizations during Review Period (2009 – 2015)
Regional
State
National
Item 5: Total Annual Research Assistance Transactions (Principle 4.6)
*This represents transactions from Jan. 1, 2015 to Dec. 1, 2015.
RefAnalytics, the web app that Research Librarians have used to record one-on-one research transactions, went live on March 17, 2011. After working out difficulties, RefAnalytics went into full use for data collection by librarians on June 1, 2011. Prior to that, librarians had used a very basic paper form to record frequencies. Therefore, audience was not recorded prior to June 1, 2011.
Item 6: Research Assistance Transactions by Audience (Principle 4.6)
*Data collection by audience began on June 1, 2011. These data, therefore, only represent 7 full months.
**Data for 2015 for this report were collected from January 1, 2015 to December 1, 2015.
Item 7: Frequency of READ Scale Values (Principle 4.6)
*A value of zero means that the librarian failed to record a value for a transaction.
**Data reported for 2013 were gathered from March 19, 2013 to December 31, 2013.
***Data reported for 2015 were gathered from January 1, 2015 to December 1, 2015.
Item 8: Narrative Responses to Patron Surveys (Principle 4.6)
In Fall 2014 Andruss Library began distributing two forms to its patrons to assess the Library’s public services. These two surveys were the Basic Assistance Survey, used to gather patrons’ responses to interactions at the Circulation Desk, and the Research Assistance Survey, used to gather patrons’ responses to research assistance from a librarian. Completing a survey was not an obligation; Library personnel asked patrons to anonymously complete the appropriate survey as a courtesy to the Library. Patrons, however, could include contact information if they wanted any type of follow-up.
The following represents survey responses from November 1, 2014 to December 1, 2015.
Basic Assistance Survey
Question 1. Did you locate what you asked about? (n=87) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes, just what I wanted |
Yes, with Limitations | Not what I asked for... | Only Partly | No | NR |
68 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 2 |
Question 2. Was the Library employee busy? (phone ringing, etc.) (n=86) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Yes | Partly | No | NR |
20 | 19 | 44 | 3 |
Question 3. Did you get enough help and explanation? (n=87) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Yes | Partly | No | NR |
79 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
All narrative responses (Comments) to the Basic Assistance Survey. For the sake of authenticity, all responses are reported verbatim (including misspelling and grammar errors).
Research Assistance Survey
Question 1. Did you locate what you asked about? (n=110_ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes, just what I wanted | Yes, with Limitations | Not what I asked for... | Only partly | No | NR |
92 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Question 2. Was the Library employee busy? (phone ringing, etc.) (n=110) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Yes | Partly | No | NR |
7 | 15 | 54 | 1 |
Question 3. Did you get enough help and explanation? (n=87) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Yes | Partly | NO | NR |
103 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
All narrative responses (Comments) to the Research Assistance Survey. For the sake of authenticity, all responses are reported verbatim (including misspelling and grammar errors).
Item 9: Library Seating (Principle 6.5)
Library Seating (AY 2014/15) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Floor | Study Carrels | Study Carrels with Computers | Soft Seating Units | Tables (outside of Group Study Rooms) |
1 | 34 | 0 | 31 | 12 |
2 | 59 | 55 | 24 | 8 |
3 | 98 | 62 | 17 | 2 |
4 | 99 | 59 | 7 | 0 |
Total | 290 | 174 | 79 | 22 |
Item 10: Allocation Formula for Academic Book Requests (Principle 5.1)
The allocation formula is used to determine what amounts are allocated for discretionary “firm” book requests for academic programs and departments.
The value calculated for each department or academic program is used as a number of points which is then used to derive a percentage of the total firm order allocation for that department or program. An example of these allocations is below.
2015/2016 Firm Allocations
Department | Other Allocation |
---|---|
Accounting | $500.00 |
Anthropology | $2,414,90 |
Art | $1,352.25 |
Audiology & Speech Path | $1,2000.00 |
Biology & Allied | $3,085.43 |
Business Education Systems | $500.00 |
Business Law | $470.40 |
Chemistry | $1,000,00 |
Communication Studies | $1,500.00 |
Computer Information Systems | $500.00 |
Criminal Justice | $1,969.59 |
Developmental Instruction | $963.10 |
Early Child. & Elementary Ed. | $2530.90 |
Economics | $1,500.00 |
EGGS | $4,033.68 |
Eng/Am. Lit | $6,500.00 |
Exceptionalities | $2,536.20 |
Exercise Science | $2,629.12 |
Finance | $500.00 |
Gender Studies | $1,000.00 |
History | $9,098.40 |
Instructional Tech. | $1,554.81 |
Language & Culture - French | $499.53 |
Language & Culture - German | $500.00 |
Language & Culture - Spanish | $1,169.49 |
Management | $1,500.00 |
Marketing | $1,521.09 |
Mass Communications | $1,500.00 |
Math & Computer Science | $1,000.00 |
Music | $2,663.90 |
Nursing | $3,009.25 |
Philosophy | $826.11 |
Physics & Engineering Technology | $1,500.00 |
Political Science | $2,000.00 |
Psychology | $3,465.85 |
Secondary Ed. | $1,056.00 |
Social Services | $500.00 |
Sociology | $2,000.00 |
Theatre | $1,200.00 |
Original Allocation | |
Departments | $73, 250.00 |
Other Funds | $17,750.00 |
Total | $91,000.00 |
Other Funds | Original Allocation |
Curriculum | $4,000.00 |
Gov Docs | $250.00 |
Juvenile | $2,500.00 |
Patron Driven Acquisitions | $4,000.00 |
Reference | $4,000.00 |
Replacements | $2,000.00 |
Special Collections |
$1,000.00 |
Digitization | $2,000.00 |
Item 11: Instructional Sessions per Teaching Librarian (Principle 8.1)
Instructional Sessions per Teaching Librarian | |||
---|---|---|---|
Instructional Sessions | Number of Teaching Librarians | Sessions per Teaching Librarian in the Academic Year | |
Fall 2008 | 144 | 6 | |
Spring 2009 | 69 | 6 | |
TOTAL | 183 | 6 | 30.5 |
Fall 2014 | 127 | 5 | |
Spring 2015 | 87 | 5 | |
TOTAL | 214 | 5 | 42.8 |
Increase in Sessions | 16.9% |
Increase in "Sessions per Teaching Librarian in the Academic Year" | 40.3% |
Item 12: Instructional Sessions per Semester (Principle 8.2)
Item 13: LibQUAL Results Link
LibQUAL Results from LIBQUAL available at: http://guides.library.bloomu.edu/LibQual
Item 14: LibQUAL 2012 Results Notebook Summary
LibQual Results Notebook Summary
(K. Yelinek: Dec. 7, 2012)
Overview
Overall, we did very well. We had 1634 respondents; of these, 1493 were valid (91%).
Based on all of the responses, the only question where the average perceived level was below the desired level was on LP-5 (Community space for group learning and group study). Because the overwhelming number of people who responded were undergraduate students (85%), I believe this result reflects the stated need for more group study rooms.
Other user groups did identify different problem areas as well as areas where they think we are doing well. Faculty, as always, identified our print & journal collections as less than desired.
Top problem areas (Perceived less than desired)
1. IC-2 (A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own)—All groups except undergrads
2. AS-9 (Dependability in handling users’ service problems)—Graduates & other staff
3. LP-5 (A community space for group learning and group study)—Undergrads only
All other questions that were singled out were singled out by only one group.
Top areas where we are doing well (Perceived greater than desired)
1. AS-1 (Employees who instill confidence in users)—Faculty, Lib staff
2. AS-4 (Readiness to respond to users’ questions)—Lib staff, Other staff
3. LP-5 (Community space for group learning and group study)—Lib staff, Other staff
All other questions that were singled out were singled out by only one group. I find it interesting that LP-5 is both here and identified as one of the top problem areas.
Here are results based on category of respondent:
Undergraduate students (85% of respondents)
Perceived less than desired: LP-5 (Community space for group learning and group study)
Perceived greater than desired: None
Graduate students (8%)
Perceived less than desired:
Perceived greater than desired:
Faculty (5%)
Perceived less than desired:
Perceived greater than desired:
Library staff (.5%)
Perceived less than desired:
Perceived greater than desired:
Other staff (2%)
Perceived less than desired:
Perceived greater than desired:
Item 15: LibQUAL Comments Summary
LibQual Comments Summary
(K. Yelinek: Dec. 14, 2012)
Overview
We received 581 comments from over 1600 people who took the survey. I’ve tried to summarize/categorize the comments below. The numbers in parentheses are the number of comments received for each idea. Numbers don’t necessarily total for each category depending on how they were phrased. Notes in square brackets are my authorial asides.
The top comments were:
1. The computers/Internet is too slow (163) [also in Top 3 for 2006 & 2009]
2. More group studies (134) [also in Top 3 for 2006 & 2009
3. The staff members are nice/helpful (69)
4. We need more computers (40)
The building/space is nice/relaxing (40)
5. Should enforce quiet study spaces/library is too noisy (35) [in Top 3 for 2006 & 2009]
6. Computers and other technology crash/freeze/are broken (28)
Should enforce 2+ people in rooms (28)
7. Your resources are good (27)
8. Need more cubicles/single study space rooms (22)
9. We need extended hours/ 24-7 hours (20)
Below, I’ve grouped the comments into the broad categories of Staff/people, Computers/technology, Resources, and Building.
Staff/people
The staff members are nice/helpful (69) #3 comment
Staff in general is rude/unhelpful (10)
Computer lab students should roam/someone should check computers & printers & etc. regularly (3)
Need a better way to contact Circ. desk from upper floors (1)
Computers/technology
The computers/Internet is too slow (163) #1 comment
We need more computers (40)
Computers and other technology crash/freeze/are broken (28)
Printers don’t work/printing jobs get lost/it’s hard to print (17)
We should limit Facebook/Twitter/Hulu/etc. (3)
Keyboards are too loud (3)
The video quality of the computer monitors is poor (1)
Love the loaner laptops (1)
Need Adobe Reader Pro (1)
Keyboards should be opened so students can type in other languages (e.g. Chinese) (1)
Don’t use Internet Explorer, use Firefox or Chrome (1)
ISIS is evil (1)
BOLT is evil, too (1)
Resources
Your resources are good (27)
It’s hard to find books/articles/etc. (16)
We need more journals (10)
Interlibrary Loan is awesome (8)
We need more of everything (databases/books/journals/etc.) (4)
Love ability to text call numbers (1)
ILL is too slow (1)
Patrons should be able to browse the CD collection/there should be an index of it (1)
The training students receive in library resources is good (1)
Interlibrary loan is confusing (1)
Love the online book request form (1)
Online book renewal is confusing (1)
We Should have an email alert system for new books on a subject (1)
Surprised we don't have Piaget's "Moral Judgment of the Child" [we do have it, but the second word is spelled "judgement" in the title] (1)
Building
More group studies (134) #2 comment
The building/space is nice/relaxing (40)
Should enforce quiet study spaces/library is too noisy (35)
Need more cubicles/single study space rooms (22)
We need extended hours/24-7 hours (20)
Building needs to be bigger/added on to/it’s too crowded (18)
Love the hours (2)
Should have staplers/hole punches in the printing rooms/on more floors (2)
We remodeled too much over the last few years so now can’t find anything (2)
We need to update the signage now that we’ve remodeled (1)
The building is consistently too hot (1)
The building is consistently too cold (1)
We should have a back entrance to accommodate students coming from the rec center (1)
Our décor needs to be updated (1)
The nonprinting/catalog computers should be physically closer to the stacks (1)
Our chairs are uncomfortable (1)
Should have a supply store in the library to buy index cards, etc. (1)
Why are the shelves bare? (1)
Why are the theses in Special Collections and not the General Collection? (1)
The toilet paper in the restrooms is uncomfortable (1)
The large screens on the first floor are pointless since they don’t show the date/weather (1)
Andruss Library | 570-389-4205 | reference@bloomu.edu
©Copyright Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania • 400 East Second Street, Bloomsburg PA 17815-1301 • 570.389.4000